Housing Market Getting Hot? Mutiple Offers and Packed Open Houses in Montclair, Maplewood

BY  |  Thursday, Mar 07, 2013 10:42am  |  COMMENTS (23)

88 Upper Mountain Ave. Montclair, listed at $3,150,000

88 Upper Mountain Ave. Montclair, listed at $3,150,000

Maybe it’s the Brooklyn Triangle, but locally, the housing market is showing strong signs of life.

“Residential market is entering a manic phase,” says Roberta Baldwin, Keller Wiliams Realty, NJ Metro Group. “Multiple offers rampant and not just 1 or two, in Montclair. Huge turnouts at open houses.”

open house cancelledLast month, Caroline Gosselin, realtor, The Gosselin Group, covering Maplewood, South Orange, Millburn area, had to cancel two open houses in the span of two weeks due to sellers receiving an offer they couldn’t refuse.

“First-time buyers and people that are selling city apartments continue to make up the heart of the market,” says Richard Stanton, Stanton Company. “The $550,000 to $750,000 range seems to be the sweet spot and we could use some more listings as many homes are seeing multiple offers and there is a pool of eager buyers out there. We have been getting frantic calls from agents saying their customers are flying in to see a home or taking a car service out after work to view a home ahead of an offer deadline.”

Is this another sign of growing housing market optimism in Montclair? New to the market is 88 Upper Mountain Avenue, a 1946 French Normandy manse (taxes $54,975) listed for $3,150,000. The highest sale last year in Montclair was $1,999,999. There’s also the recent sale of a three-bedroom townhouse at 21 North Mountain Ave in Montclair. Listed at $949,000, it sold for $960,000.

Are you in the market to sell or buy?


  1. POSTED BY frankgg  |  March 07, 2013 @ 10:50 am

    oh la la!!! c’est tres tres mignon!

  2. POSTED BY raeven  |  March 07, 2013 @ 10:53 am

    This happens every spring. Families want to move before the school year (buy in spring, close and move in summer). Sales start going down again as summer approaches.

  3. POSTED BY Spiro T. Quayle  |  March 07, 2013 @ 11:01 am

    To paraphrase Mark Twain, “The reports of Montclair’s death ( allegedly due to high taxes, left wing voting and spending preferences, etc ) are greatly exaggerated”. Clearly, it’s still quite popular and vital.

  4. POSTED BY Mrs Martta  |  March 07, 2013 @ 11:20 am

    According to Zillow.com, the value of most of the houses in my nabe have gone up between $2,000 and $3,000 in the past few months. While I’m not ready to break out the champagne and do the Happy Dance, it’s nice to read some good news for a change. It’s nice to see a + sign next to the estimated prices again.

  5. POSTED BY Conan  |  March 07, 2013 @ 11:47 am

    “There’s also the recent sale of a three-bedroom townhouse at 21 North Mountain Ave in Montclair. Listed at $949,000, it sold for $960,000.”

    Frank GG, correct me if I am wrong (it won’t cause any stress), but I believe that (those) townhouses were built in 2009 right near where you lived on North Mountain. I also recall that the teardown of the exisitng house on that lot caused many Baristanet practitioners much grief and engendered a number of “The Sky is Falling!”-type comments.

  6. POSTED BY caphilly  |  March 07, 2013 @ 11:59 am

    As I’ve always said to people here who have complained to the township that they’re going to move out because of high taxes, ultimately no one cares if they do. It just makes room for people coming in who CAN afford the taxes and there seems to be plenty who can.

    For better or worse . . .it’s what it is.

  7. POSTED BY jerseygurl  |  March 07, 2013 @ 12:01 pm

    Great news! I’ll be able to sell in a few years and head to a warmer climate!

  8. POSTED BY Mrs Martta  |  March 07, 2013 @ 12:11 pm

    Right behind you, JG!

  9. POSTED BY frankgg  |  March 07, 2013 @ 12:11 pm

    I’ve since moved from North Mountain….and I think that those townhouses dont look as nice as the house was torn down.I really think that they look ugly. My mother has moved from South Mountain because they built townhouses next to her. These townhouses just seem to cheapen the neighborhood and I wish that they would knock it off with this kind of development.

  10. POSTED BY Conan  |  March 07, 2013 @ 12:54 pm

    Frank, thanks for the update — I remember your moving from North Mountain (one of the better garage sales in Baristaville, as I recall!). It does seem strange, I guess, to put up a very different building (architecturally and structurally) where it doesn’t conform with its neighbors. Many towns (and I am channeling my New England history, here) don’t even allow that via zoning regulations — so it becomes a matter of preserving or recreating the past versus moving on to the present and the future. Not taking sides, but I am sure it would be completely cost-prohibitive to build new housing in Montclair that looks like the old housing in Montclair.

  11. POSTED BY Spiro T. Quayle  |  March 07, 2013 @ 1:03 pm

    It’s a long standing Montclair tradition for new houses to look different from old ones…. No doubt there was great outrage when the larger lots were subdivided in the 1920’s and developers started building all those Dutch Colonials in between the Victorians.

  12. POSTED BY Conan  |  March 07, 2013 @ 1:06 pm

    Liz — thanks for the blast to the past; damn, that was seven years ago and there was RoC, Cathar, Iceman, Martta (still Miss Martta, then), and Roo, that old loveable quipping marsupial, commenting away like it was only yesterday! Within four of five posts the thread was hijacked into Trolls vs. Liberals, repubs vs. dems, and then back again. Lots of sound, a little fury, and no decisions. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose!

    P.S. Looks like toward the end that thread got hijacked again by folks who were putting in very offensive comments and links to porn.

  13. POSTED BY jerseygurl  |  March 07, 2013 @ 1:09 pm
  14. POSTED BY Conan  |  March 07, 2013 @ 1:32 pm

    Gurl — your Malibu listing has a caveat (in small print): “retaining wall needs major work.” That is a euphimism for “the slightest rainfall will send your entire front yard and most of your house lurching down the hill.” Of course, that would make it closer to the ocean… 🙂

    As for Santa Barbara, bring two suitcases full of $100 bills. For the down payment.


  15. POSTED BY jerseygurl  |  March 07, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

    Conan, cute house! Well there are still a few affordable small homes/townhomes in Carpinteria and Summerland right next door. I’ll be the taxes on an $8mm home there are probably close to what you’d pay here for something much more modest.

  16. POSTED BY Mrs Martta  |  March 07, 2013 @ 1:58 pm

    Ah, the good old days!

  17. POSTED BY Mrs Martta  |  March 07, 2013 @ 2:41 pm

    Both homes are nice but it’s true what Conan says about beach front property perched on a hill. The beams that hold many of these homes up have to be inspected regularly for rot.

  18. POSTED BY walleroo  |  March 07, 2013 @ 11:50 pm

    Great news! I’ll be able to sell in a few years and head to a warmer climate!

    Right behind you, JG!

    Don’t let the door hit you in the a$$ on the way out.

  19. POSTED BY bebopgun  |  March 08, 2013 @ 6:40 am

    Hooray for the 1%ers.

  20. POSTED BY kay  |  March 08, 2013 @ 10:04 am

    Dearest ‘Roo, don’t feel bad that some of our friends are planning to abandon us. You can come live under my porch – it’s a nice roomy one, too – and I promise I won’t gouge you on rent. You can even use the back yard for hopping around (but don’t eat my plants).

    You see, I will need a boarder in a couple of years, after I lose the child tax credit and I get hit with the next property tax increase.

  21. POSTED BY stu  |  March 08, 2013 @ 10:31 am


    There’s plenty of room at the hotel Stulifornia.

  22. POSTED BY Mrs Martta  |  March 08, 2013 @ 4:19 pm

    If I ever win the Powerball, I would like to split my time between the California desert in the winter and Edgartown, MA in the summer.

Featured Comment

I'm struck by how much attention is being paid to the details of a parking lot, as opposed to the attention paid to the future impact of the monstrous projects being planned.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe