Montclair First Ward Community Meeting Features Traffic & Pedestrian Talk and Special Guests

BY  |  Friday, Oct 20, 2017 8:06am  |  COMMENTS (5)

Montclair First Ward Councilor William Hurlock had numerous guests to join him at his October 19 community meeting at the Bellevue Avenue Library branch, but despite the array of topics covered, constituents’ concerns still came down to two central issue: traffic and pedestrian safety.

Officer Travis Davis of the Montclair Police Department’s community policing unit was on hand to address the many concerns about traffic.  He said the traffic bureau has made more of an effort to enforce ordinances pertaining to motor vehicles and will soon add another officer to its ranks, but he conceded that budget restrictions and a lack of available personnel made enforcement difficult.  “Our traffic unit is only going to get bigger and bigger as our resources allow for that to happen,” he said.  Office Davis also said radar was being used to monitor areas of concern in the township, and he noted that police officers are helping with enforcement through overtime, between 4 P.M. and 8 P.M., paid though grants the township has received.

Constituents brought up many of the same problems that have surfaced at council meetings, notably motorists who pass to the right of cars stopped for pedestrians and motorists who fail to stop at “perceived crosswalks” – intersections with no designated crosswalks at the corners.  One resident said the law requires motorists to stop where people cross streets at such intersections if there is a person waiting to cross, but Officer Davis said he heard of no such law.

Councilor Hurlock said there was a need for motorists and pedestrians to show respect for each other, and he expressed a desire to see pedestrians take more responsibility for their actions.  The councilor cited a bill before the legislature, the Driver and Pedestrian Mutual Responsibility Act, which would make it plain that pedestrians can only cross at designated crosswalks, saying that shifting greater responsibility to the pedestrian should be considered.  He said Montclair doesn’t have the money to add more blinking-light signs to intersections and that pedestrians should take more care in crossing the street and look for oncoming traffic, as he learned to do when he was growing up.

One resident said she knew a woman who comes from Columbia, Missouri, which applied for and got grants to educate locals about pedestrians’ responsibilities and she suggested that Montclair look into the idea.  Motorists who passed cars stopped for pedestrians on the right were another concern, voiced at the October 3 council meeting, and Councilor-at-Large Rich McMahon, who attended Councilor Hurlock’s meeting, pointed out that such illegal passing was a greater concern than the speed limit on Grove Street.  Councilor Hurlock continued to stress that traffic-safety ordinances already on the books need to be enforced more, and he also said there was no quick fix to the pedestrian issue, saying that the town needed to be much more involved.

The infrastructure of the streets themselves was another issue.  Councilor Hurlock reported that more streets were steadily being resurfaced and/or re-curbed, but he remained frustrated with dealing with PSE&G to avoid newly paved streets being opened up by the utility.   He told an anecdote of how the township cleared street repairs with PSE&G before going ahead with such repairs, only to have PSE&G dig up newly redone streets.  It turned out the councilor and the township manager’s office had communicated with PSE&G’s electric unit, which had completed its work in Montclair where streets had been redone, but not with its gas unit, which had more work to do.  Councilor Hurlock told residents at the meeting that neither unit of the utility communicates with each other.  He also got pleas from constituents that vegetation obscuring signs and traffic lights ought to pared down.

The councilor’s special guests briefed the constituents on other issues.  Ilmar Vanderer, a trustee of the Montclair Public Library, explained the New Jersey Library Construction Bond Act, which is up for a referendum vote on the ballot this November 7.  The referendum would allow the state to sell bonds totaling $125 million to distribute as grants to libraries across New Jersey to allow them to upgrade and modernize their facilities.  Vanderer also noted that a grant from such a program would allow the Bellevue Avenue branch of the library to get an elevator and become more compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.  Although Vanderer could not tell people how to vote, he said he wanted to explain the issue to the constituents.

On the subject of the library, Kathleen Bennett of the Montclair Historic Preservation Commission reported on the progress of the restoration to the Bellevue Avenue branch, clearly obvious from the plywood in place on the older windows.  She said the new windows will be able to be opened and that the frames – painted a greenish teal – were proven to have been more of an antique white.  She said that grills had been on the front double door and hoped the money could be found to restore it to its original look.  She said that the double door itself might be replaced.

Helen Fallon of the Montclair History Center informed the constituents of upcoming events, including a walking tour of Rosedale Cemetery on October 29, a restaurant-foodie walking tour on November 5, and historic-house tours on November 12 (all Sundays).   Also, Republican candidates for the state Assembly representing the 34th district, Nicholas Surgent and Tafari Anderson, introduced themselves to the audience.  Surgent and Anderson, both Clifton residents, said they were running for the seats in the district, which includes all of Montclair, to help improve schools and do something about property taxes. Councilor Hurlock had invited their Democratic opponents, incumbents Sheila Oliver (who is concurrently running for lieutenant governor) and Thomas Giblin, to the meeting as well, but both were unable to come.

Also, Councilor Hurlock also announced that the groundbreaking for Clifton’s sewer pipe project through the Bonsal Preserve should occur in a week or so.  He had been in contact with Clifton Councilman Ray Grabowski over the plans to get the project started.  “We’re going to keep our fingers crossed,” he said.

5 Comments

  1. POSTED BY tsmith  |  October 20, 2017 @ 10:56 am

    So the Montclair PD is basically saying they don’t have enough money to enforce speed limits (and its obvious to anyone who lives in town that they’re not enforced at all and widely ignored) or pedestrian traffic laws.

    That’s pretty incredible to me considering how much we pay in taxes, and that a big part of the draw of this town is its walkability. Anyone have the statistics on pedestrian injuries and deaths that have occurred in Montclair in the last few years? I remember them being pretty high, and wonder how high they have to get before it does become a priority for the town. It should be already.

    If Mr. Hurlock doesn’t want to make pedestrian safety a priority in the first ward – better speed limit signage (it’s erratically placed and displayed at best) and markings for crosswalks would be a start – maybe it’s time for someone to run against him who will.

  2. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 20, 2017 @ 1:03 pm

    “We as law enforcement officers do not have any authority to issue anyone a summons for not stopping for someone if they’re not in a crosswalk,” the officer said. “That’s considered to be jay-walking.”

    Fabulous. I get it now. No crosswalk at intersection, it’s considered jaywalking. Since pedestrian conflicts happen most frequently at intersections, I will do my best to cross midblock as my chances are clearly more in my favor. It really doesn’t matter to me if the police issue a ticket after I get hit.

  3. POSTED BY jeffjacobson  |  October 20, 2017 @ 8:16 pm

    There is so much wrong here that it’s hard to know where to start. It is NOT jaywalking for a pedestrian to cross a street at a corner simply because the intersection is not marked with a crosswalk. It is true, however, that the law only requires drivers to stop for pedestrians in marked crosswalks. In high-traffic areas, we definitely want to (1) encourage pedestrians to cross at marked crosswalks, and (2) enforce the law against drivers who fail to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks. Obviously, police cannot be everywhere, but the idea that we cannot make a serious effort at enforcement—shifting resources regularly among the intersections/neighborhoods we know to be a problem—is maddening.

    Frank: Nationally, most auto-vs.-ped accidents happen mid-block. (That’s where kids dart out between parked cars to chase balls, etc.) I don’t know the statistics in Montclair specifically.

  4. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 20, 2017 @ 10:35 pm

    Off the top of my head, we typically range in the low 40’s total accidents annually with about 2-3 pedestrian deaths. The last 2 happened within marked crosswalks, one a low traffic area, the other a high traffic area. I believe the 3rd one on Bloomfield Ave was mid block. Victims age profiles roughly follow demographics of town, skewed to the older.

  5. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 22, 2017 @ 8:02 pm

    There is so much wrong here that it’s hard to know where to start.

    Jeff,

    It gets worse. The Township can’t, for the life of themselves, figure out how to fix Upper Mountain Ave speed limits.

    For the record, the speed limit is 30 mph except for a ½ mile, 35 mph stretch from Watchung to Bloomfield Av.

    Rather than follow their ordinances, the Township has signed it 35 mph all the way to Mountainside Park. Southbound, they signed is 35 mph starting at Bellevue.

    Not stopping there, Township considers Mountainside Park to be a 25 mph zone, yet it is signed for 30 mph as the County says.

    But, to add insult to injury, they post the new ordinance to the agenda that basically says “whatever”, it is really not that important an issue to get right.

    So, this ordinance is to eliminate 35 mph from the entire length of Grove St. That leaves our 90-odd miles of roadway at 25-30 mph…except for this ½ mile stretch. ½ mile left. Why, yes, right, it is an arterial. Dumb and dumber.

Leave a Reply

Baristanet Comment Policy:

Baristanet has specific guidelines for commenting. To avoid having your comment deleted -- or your commenting privileges revoked -- read this before you comment. Violators will be banned from commenting.

Report a comment that violates the guidelines to [email protected] For trouble with registration or commenting, write to [email protected]

Commenters on Baristanet.com are responsible for all legal consequences arising from their comments, including libel, infringement of copyright or actions that threaten a third party. By submitting a comment, you agree to indemnify Baristanet LLC, its partners and employees from any legal action arising from your comments.

In order to comment on the new system, you need to register a new Baristanet account. To get your own avatar next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Comment

Sad. Let's hope that this is not its "Last Tango." One of the most beautiful and iconic buildings in town. Valentino, Garbo, Keaton must have played there.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe

Links & Information

Baristanet on Flickr