MontClairVoyant: New Holidays – Variance Day, Drive Slower Day, Let Teachers Teach Day…

BY  |  Thursday, Oct 05, 2017 12:30pm  |  COMMENTS (58)

MontClairVoyant

 


DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

On Oct. 2, Montclair Cares About Schools brought attention to a new middle-school English Language Arts curriculum that’s “standards”-oriented, less creative, studies fewer complete novels, and is not teacher-driven. Your reaction?

Sincerely,
Another “Reform” Storm

Unhappiness. And I wonder, as I finish writing this Oct. 5 column the afternoon of Oct. 4, whether the matter will come up at the Board of Education meeting the evening of Oct. 4. My time machine is in the shop.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,
Teachers know what’s best for students! Meanwhile, will the Planning Board and Township Council ever REALLY listen to the many residents who don’t want Montclair so overbuilt?

Sincerely,
Inured to Being Ignored

Residents might get a respectful hearing if they dress as developers for Halloween.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,
But that’s just one day a year!

Sincerely,
Octavia October

If you want 1/365th fewer variances, draw dollar signs on a high-thread-count sheet, cut out a hole for your head, don that developer costume, ring the doorbells of Montclair officials, and yell, “Gentrification or treat!”

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

I tried that last Halloween, and got such warm hugs from some officials I felt uncomfortable. They and developers are besties, right?

Sincerely,
Friends, Sans Jennifer Aniston

It’s a love story for the ages.

 


DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

One overbuilding example is the proposed Lackawanna Plaza redo. But you want a new supermarket there, don’t you?

Sincerely,
The Store-y in Your Eyes

Absolutely, just not 280 housing units along with it. Perhaps a few igloos in the frozen-food aisle.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,
But didn’t the Township Council say Oct. 3 that it would consult more with the Planning Board on Lackawanna?

Sincerely,
Myna Adjustments

That may make the project SLA (Slightly Less Awful) — not to be confused with Montclair’s popular Thai restaurant SLA.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Speaking of international, why did the mayor get so defensive at the TC meeting when questioned about how the cost of visits between Montclair and its sister cities are paid for (via taxes and/or privately)?

Sincerely,
Flight Behavior

I’ll avoid saying there’s guilt over gilt, because I worry about the psychic cost of too much wordplay.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

And residents pleaded with the TC to reduce the speed limit from 35 to 30 on dangerous Grove Street. Agree?

Sincerely,
Speaking for Safety

Totally. I suggested last week that the limit even be 25, but I can’t say more now because today’s column is longer than usual. Hoping for an abridged “War and Peace” edition with the one-word title “…and…”

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Meanwhile, there’s talk about whether rec-soccer games should have been played Sept. 30 on Yom Kippur. Thoughts?

Sincerely,
Wide Whirl of Sports

I’m surprised Montclair officials never started a holiday called Variance Day.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Developers could put gifts for each other (Lamborghinis?) under dead/tinseled Variance Trees symbolizing ruined open space. But what about the unhealthiness of some school lunches and vending-machine items — the subject of recent parent complaints?

Sincerely,
Food for Thought

“Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.” Oops, I just channeled Capt. Picard using his “Star Trek” replicator. But drinking Earl Grey IS a balanced diet when holding a cup in each hand.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Montclair students have Columbus Day off Oct. 9, but it’s more a teacher-workshop thing than a holiday. Any plans?

Sincerely,
Iz A. Bella and Ferd D. Nand

I’d like to stand at Montclair’s Christopher-Columbus corner and scream, “He brutalized Native-Americans — the actual discoverers of this country!”

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Did any Nina, Pinta, or Santa Maria crew members jump ship at that intersection in 1492?

Sincerely,
To See Clary Anderson Arena

Yes, according to the 1493 edition of “Who’s Who in the New World.”

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,
Not a New World for Native-Americans. Our town was quite different back then, wasn’t it?

Sincerely,
Fewer iPhones

Sure, but the “Lackawanna Plaza Redevelopment Proposal” Facebook page was already annoying.

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Let’s talk about shooting violence from which Montclair hasn’t been immune. Will the horrific Oct. 1 massacre in Las Vegas FINALLY lead to more gun control?

Sincerely,
White-Male Terrorism

Unlikely, given that Connecticut’s horrific 2012 elementary-school massacre had no effect — with the evil NRA and right-wing Republicans telling each other: “How do I love thee? Let me count the bullets.”

 

DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT,

Yikes — apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning. And people who say their “thoughts and prayers” are with gun-carnage victims without also calling for more gun control need to JUST SHUT UP. Any final comment?

Sincerely,
Leave Famous Poetry Alone!

Very sad to hear about the Sept. 28 passing of Montclair resident Monica Bartlett, who was just 50. A really nice person who did great work for many organizations — including the aforementioned Montclair Cares About Schools.

 

Dave Astor, author, is the MontClairVoyant. His opinions about politics and local events are strictly his own and do not represent or reflect the views of Baristanet.

 

 

 

 

58 Comments

  1. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 05, 2017 @ 2:22 pm

    MONTCLAIRVOYANT

    “Absolutely, just not 280 housing units along with it. Perhaps a few igloos in the frozen-food aisle.”

    Pheeew . . . for a moment, I thought you were going to say “egg glues”, found in either the dairy or stationary supply aisle.

    Nanook of the North

  2. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 05, 2017 @ 2:33 pm

    MONTCLAIRVOYANT

    “I’d like to stand at Montclair’s Christopher-Columbus corner and scream, “He brutalized Native-Americans — the actual discoverers of this country!”

    Those aggressive RE development plans may very well call for the building of condominiums at that very intersection. In that case, we will all be saying, “Good-bye Christopher and Columbus.”

  3. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 05, 2017 @ 2:46 pm

    Thank you, silverleaf, for your two VERY entertaining comments!

    I have no (Portnoy’s) complaint about your clever reference to Philip Roth’s novel “Goodbye, Columbus.” I guess if there’s already Christopher Court in a residential neighborhood, there could also be Christopher Columbus Court a mile or so south… 🙁

    And your droll first comment mentioning supermarket-aisle confusion reminds me of how the star of the “WALL-E” movie had trouble deciding whether a spork belonged in the spoon or fork slot!

  4. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 05, 2017 @ 3:01 pm

    Very funny, Dave.

    “Meanwhile, there’s talk about whether rec-soccer games should have been played Sept. 30 on Yom Kippur. Thoughts?”

    Well, that discussion best be reserved for “The Conversation With the Jews”, or so says Philip Roth.

  5. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 05, 2017 @ 3:13 pm

    Ha, silverleaf! I’m sure Philip Roth would hold up his end of the conversation. 🙂

    Tennis was THE sport in “Goodbye, Columbus” – which makes one wonder if CC’s sailors swatted balls between the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria…

  6. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 05, 2017 @ 5:03 pm

    Dave – Basketball was THE sport in novel, I’d say. Brenda’s brother “Big Ron Patimkin” played hoops for Ohio State. Later in the story, he graduates, gets marrried and leaves Columbus, OH, hence the book’s title. I do remember the scene where Brenda plays tennis with a girl who attends Bennington.

  7. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 05, 2017 @ 5:43 pm

    You’re right, silverleaf. I guess I read that novel too long ago. 🙂 Some tennis scenes in the book — perhaps between Brenda Patimkin and Neil Klugman, too? — but, now that you’ve reminded me, more of a basketball motif. You know literature!

  8. POSTED BY Spiro T. Quayle  |  October 06, 2017 @ 8:45 am

    So Dave, if someone wants to celebrate Variance Day, would they need to notify all their neighbors within 200 feet ?

  9. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 06, 2017 @ 9:11 am

    That’s hilarious, Spiro! 🙂

    And at the Variance Day celebration you speak of, there would be only 20 parking spaces for the 40 invited guests…

  10. POSTED BY Spiro T. Quayle  |  October 06, 2017 @ 9:43 am

    good one, Dave.

  11. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 06, 2017 @ 9:45 am

    Thank you, Spiro!

  12. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 06, 2017 @ 3:09 pm

    DEAR MONTCLAIRVOYANT

    “Not a New World for Native-Americans. Our town was quite different back then, wasn’t it?”

    Signed: Aldous Huxley, James Fennimore Cooper, Thornton Wilder

  13. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 06, 2017 @ 5:06 pm

    Clever, silverleaf! The writers of “Brave New World,” “The Last of the Mohicans,” and “Our Town”!

    Two or three years ago, I read all five of Cooper’s “Leatherstocking” novels, and actually liked “The Deerslayer” (in which Natty Bumppo is very young) more than “The Last of the Mohicans.”

    You probably know this, but Cooper’s father established Cooperstown — the New York burg that of course later became famous for its Baseball Hall of Fame.

  14. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 06, 2017 @ 10:57 pm

    Chance, the gardener.

  15. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 07, 2017 @ 7:35 am

    The star of “Being There”! A profound novel and movie. I know it should be obvious to me, but is there a Montclair connection or some another connection related to that character I should be seeing? Thanks, Frank!

  16. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 07, 2017 @ 8:11 am

    Chance’s simplicity is mistaken for wisdom. Hmm…what person or persons might that remind us of? 🙂

  17. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 07, 2017 @ 9:21 am

    Which can refer to Donald Trump — at least in the eyes of some of his followers.

  18. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 07, 2017 @ 9:22 am

    Very good! Your 2 posts, together, summarized the book.

    PS: and yes, another local ‘kicker’ – a must read, short-form novel, for MPS this year.

  19. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 07, 2017 @ 9:30 am

    Sorry Dave. Your 9:21 post…baahh. wrong.
    Book’s message.

  20. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 07, 2017 @ 9:45 am

    Thank you, Frank! If the Montclair school district is going to teach more shorter fiction than before, it could do worse than Jerzy Kosinski’s compelling novella. (Although “Being There,” at least to me, is one of the rare cases of the movie being better than the book it’s based on.) Still, teaching fewer medium-to-longer novels seems like a shame. We all read more than enough short things, especially online.

  21. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 08, 2017 @ 11:01 am

    “Being There,” at least to me, is one of the rare cases of the movie being better than the book

    Definitely, but a low bar.

    BTW, not a favorite of mine. It just seemed an appropriate reference since 52% of the voters could relate to Dr Allenby.

  22. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 08, 2017 @ 2:26 pm

    True, Frank. As interesting as the book was to me, it wasn’t fleshed out enough. The edition I read (many years ago) had to have been less than 150 pages.

    Great point about Dr. Allenby! He saw Chance for what he is — an unsophisticated, mostly clueless man — even as many other people misinterpreted Chance’s simplistic talk as allegorical and profound.

  23. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 08, 2017 @ 2:28 pm

    Oops — “is” should have been “was” before the first dash in the above comment.

  24. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 08, 2017 @ 7:01 pm

    But, he walks on water (and not in the Christian sense) in the closing scene of the movie. Hmmh.

  25. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 08, 2017 @ 7:14 pm

    Quite a closing scene, Frank! It certainly got the attention of movie viewers, and could be interpreted in different ways. If any of Montclair’s 2020 mayoral candidates walk on Edgemont Pond, it could be an interesting race (for the geese, at least). 🙂

  26. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 08, 2017 @ 8:53 pm

    Or, it could just be Hollywood desperately trying to be profound.

    None of the existing Council could do it, so it would really have to be a wildcard.

  27. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 08, 2017 @ 9:16 pm

    Hollywood often DOES try to be profound (not always succeeding, of course). Hollywood also often attempts to surprise moviegoers with strange, controversial, and/or out-of-left-field endings that get people talking — whether those endings make sense or not.

    “None of the existing Council could do it, so it would really have to be a wildcard” — ha! 🙂 There ARE a few gardeners in town…

  28. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 10, 2017 @ 9:48 am

    Dave – Chance the gardener; reminds me of the name of my landscaper. Never know if or when he’ll be mowing my lawn. And at his prices, that’s ok by me.

  29. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 10, 2017 @ 10:11 am

    silverleaf, I loved your comment — and its deadpan last line was hilarious!

    When I owned a home in Montclair (I’m now in an apartment), I had absolutely no respect for the person who took care of my lawn. That person was…me. 🙂

  30. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 10, 2017 @ 3:37 pm

    Hollywood profound? C’mon. That like arguing 7th Avenue is profound.
    That would put Miramax on par with Ohrbach’s. Wow. My brain is locked-up.

  31. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 10, 2017 @ 3:47 pm

    Ohrbach’s a blast from the past, Frank. Miramax thinking of a name change as Miriam and Max rolling over right now. Harvey the Dinosaur’s mea culpa’s as hollow as his morality.

  32. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 10, 2017 @ 4:00 pm

    Frank, I hear you and you’re almost totally right. But once in a while I think Hollywood does get profound — sort of the “even a broken clock is correct twice a day” syndrome.

    Greatly enjoyed your Seventh Avenue comparison! I suppose Bruce Springsteen found Tenth Avenue profound, in a freeze-out sort of way…

  33. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 10, 2017 @ 4:07 pm

    Well said, silverleaf! Harvey Weinstein is indeed a disgrace, as are other sexual harassers/predators such as Bill O’Reilly, Bill Cosby, and Donald Trump. Yet one was elected President. Sick.

  34. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 10, 2017 @ 4:14 pm

    Dave – I was thinking, “Seventh Avenue Freeze Out” performed by Tommy Gambino & the Garment District Five.”

  35. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 10, 2017 @ 5:29 pm

    Ha ha, silverleaf!!! That could be the best performance since “Monster Mash” by Boris Pickett and the Crypt-Kicker Five!

  36. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 10, 2017 @ 5:45 pm

    Oops — that was Boris Pickett and the Crypt-Kickers. Not sure they had five members. But they did have five sore toes on each foot…

  37. POSTED BY silverleaf  |  October 11, 2017 @ 1:13 pm

    Right, Dave . . . “Monster Mash” was a big hit back in ’62. The great Leon Russell played piano on that recording.

  38. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 11, 2017 @ 3:01 pm

    That’s a GREAT piece of musical trivia, silverleaf!

  39. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 11, 2017 @ 7:52 pm

    And a nice piece of garment district history.

  40. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 11, 2017 @ 7:57 pm

    “Absolutely, just not 280 housing units along with it. Perhaps a few igloos in the frozen-food aisle.”

    How about 280 Accessory Dwelling Units?

  41. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 11, 2017 @ 8:27 pm

    “How about 280 Accessory Dwelling Units?” Hmm. Maybe throughout the town, but not all near Lackawanna Plaza.

    Actually, Frank, I have mixed feelings about ADUs. More affordable than some other kinds of housing, which is nice, but many ADUs in houses or on the properties of houses could increase Montclair’s already maxed-out school population.

  42. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 11, 2017 @ 9:26 pm

    I obviously don’t. It will kill property values in the R-0 & R-1 zones. Anything ½ mile within MSU will be converted to university housing. I’m not worried about the schools in the least. They will go downhill on their own.

    Overall, one of the dumbest and ill-informed concepts I’ve heard in decades. And we’re doing it to retain 3-5% of the population over 70 because they enrich our lives. God bless us!

  43. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 11, 2017 @ 11:54 pm

    Frank, I had been pretty sure your first comment about ADUs was sort of tongue-in-cheek, but I chose to answer it seriously. Thanks for the follow-up thoughts.

  44. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 12, 2017 @ 11:01 am

    Dave,

    Remember not too long ago when I mentioned developers come in many shapes & sizes? Well, add the proponents of Accessory Dwelling Units.

    The ADU ordinance offer owners of single-family households a new income-producing opportunity equivalent to subdividing their lot. This is in addition to the right to lodge 2 unrelated people in the primary residence. This is all in the single-family R-0 and R-1 Zones because that is where the extra capacity is. Most of Montclair. Oh well.

    The part I love the best is the original sin. That is where the Council & the Planning Board got together and said Montclair needs to grow, but we are going to grow the commercial zones with mixed use. The residential zones would be sacrosanct.

    Now, we are going to divide the R-1 zones, but use a metric that doesn’t count it as divided.
    You really have to have a developer’s mindset to come up with this one. Credit to where it is due.

    So, conversion of garages will be one way to go. Move the cars out of the garages – garages that are often 2′-6′ from the property line. Add a Home Depot storage shed for the tools, etc in the rear yard. Now we’ll Big Yellow Taxi the front yard, rear & side yard for more parking & driveways. Liking it.

    PS: I don’t see how any to this impacts the school enrollments. I just made a reference because you did.

  45. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 12, 2017 @ 11:35 am

    Accessory Dwelling Units certainly have their drawbacks, Frank, which you knowledgeably listed. Yet a limited number would be better for Montclair than the rampant downtown overdevelopment currently going on. At least ADUs are less expensive for tenants, and the income from them could keep some struggling homeowners in town. Of course, it would be nice if Montclair had a greater number of affordable housing of other kinds — such as modestly priced apartments.

    While ADUs might not bring in a lot of new students, there could be some — say, from a single parent with one kid in an ADU.

  46. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 12, 2017 @ 1:08 pm

    What is the problem we are trying to solve for?

    Financial help for struggling homeowners? More low-cost rentals? Aging In Place? MSU Housing?

    Limited number?

    There are no limits proposed. Anywhere in any R-0 or R-1 zone.

  47. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 12, 2017 @ 1:44 pm

    Excellent questions, Frank.

    In response to your first bold-faced question, I’d love to see more lower-cost rentals — which could also help struggling homeowners (I was one until I moved from a Montclair house to a Montclair apartment three years ago) and help aging residents stay in town. All that doesn’t necessarily need ADUs to be attempted. Montclair State housing? I tend to feel the university should take care of that need — it has certainly built a lot of on-campus housing in recent years.

    Your second question? You may be right that if ADUs are allowed, the number could not be limited. I don’t know enough about that to say for sure.

    Thanks!

  48. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 12, 2017 @ 8:20 pm

    The lowest common denominator… every group wants development of some type. Developers obviously want development. Empty nesters & Seniors want options tailored to their needs. Municipal government wants development. Even the Environmental Commission wants development. New/old guard. Young/old. Right/left. None want to talk numbers. Why is that?

  49. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 12, 2017 @ 8:54 pm

    I hear you, Frank. But there is smart development and dumb development. (Well, maybe not dumb for the developers making a financial killing.) Development can be 1) modest in size, 2) look good, 3) not be just for the affluent, and so on. In Montclair, often a fail in all three of those criteria.

  50. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 13, 2017 @ 10:20 am

    Christopher Court is a perfect example of Smart Development. It’s problem was it was ahead of its time.

    That lot density is now approaching compatibility with the mainstream thinking in town. Funny, but the proposed ADU concept is the same density as Crisco. Do the math.

    I was just thinking about the designs of the homes at 44 Pleasant Avenue that the Planning Board approved this year. With a few permit-free modifications, these homes are ADU-ready.

  51. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 13, 2017 @ 10:37 am

    Frank, I guess Christopher Court looks somewhat smart compared to the huge things going up downtown, but I respectively disagree that CC was/is smart development.

    First of all, a historic structure (The Marlboro Inn, partly dating back to the 1840s) surrounded by lots of open space was demolished to make way for CC. One can argue about the struggling Inn’s viability at the time, but there could have been some kind of respectful alternative — turning the building into a museum, turning it into some kind of housing while keeping its shell and some of its interior, etc.

    Also, too many houses (10) were crammed into that space (which I used to live two blocks from). If the Inn was going to go, perhaps six houses would have been better. Probably still profitable, albeit not as profitable, for the developer. Plus the 10 large houses were plunked into a residential neighborhood, where they look way out of scale.

    CC was indeed kind of prescient — helping set the template for overdevelopment to come. But I don’t think that’s a good thing. Overdevelopment seems to be mainstream thinking for developers and many town officials, but I don’t think its mainstream thinking for residents in general.

    End of rant. 🙂 Sorry I went on like that.

  52. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 13, 2017 @ 10:40 am

    Oops — “its” should be “it’s” in “I don’t think it’s mainstream thinking for residents in general.”

  53. POSTED BY State Street Pete  |  October 13, 2017 @ 10:53 am

    Christopher Court is where Montclair began to go wrong. It is completely out of place for the area. Worse of all, it set the direction for years to come.

  54. POSTED BY State Street Pete  |  October 13, 2017 @ 10:54 am

    *Worst*

    (Mmmmm, wurst….)

  55. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 13, 2017 @ 11:20 am

    Well said, Pete, and I totally agree! When a certain developer got permission to build the hulking Christopher Court, he and other developers undoubtedly figured they could now get away with almost anything. Making parts of Montclair way too crowded? No problem when there’s profit to be maximized. 🙁

    Funny aside about wurst!

  56. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 13, 2017 @ 11:43 am

    Frank, one more error by me: I should have written “respectfully,” not “respectively.” And, again, sorry about the rant nature of my comment. The Marlboro Inn/Christopher Court situation of a dozen years ago still gets me upset.

  57. POSTED BY Frank Rubacky  |  October 14, 2017 @ 11:34 am

    No need whatsoever to apologize. I applaud your passion and nothing was offensive.

    We’ve covered our respective ‘preserve or not’ arguments and Goldilocks’s densities.
    It is actually Smart Development. Yes, bastardized (or evolved?) from its origins. A catch-all phrase that means nothing.

    Homeowner to Zoning Board: I want to subdivide my lot and redevelop the new lot.

    Zoning Board: Is it your intent to follow Smart Development or the Dumb Development principles?

    Homeowner: Well, Smart Development is prohibitively expensive and really doesn’t apply under Euclidian zoning. By definition, following current zoning & land use ordinances is dumb development. So, I am asking for variances so I can follow neither, still make some money, and not rock the local boat.

    Zoning Board: OK, but you have to put in more trees.

  58. POSTED BY daveastor  |  October 14, 2017 @ 3:31 pm

    Thanks, Frank!

    Interesting — I guess Smart Development, with a capital S and D, is indeed a catch-all phrase that can encompass smart development and not-so-smart development.

    And your homeowner/zoning board conversation was a perfect combination of serious and hilarious!

Leave a Reply

Baristanet Comment Policy:

Baristanet has specific guidelines for commenting. To avoid having your comment deleted -- or your commenting privileges revoked -- read this before you comment. Violators will be banned from commenting.

Report a comment that violates the guidelines to [email protected] For trouble with registration or commenting, write to [email protected]

Commenters on Baristanet.com are responsible for all legal consequences arising from their comments, including libel, infringement of copyright or actions that threaten a third party. By submitting a comment, you agree to indemnify Baristanet LLC, its partners and employees from any legal action arising from your comments.

In order to comment on the new system, you need to register a new Baristanet account. To get your own avatar next to your comments, sign up at Gravatar.com

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Comment

I'm struck by how much attention is being paid to the details of a parking lot, as opposed to the attention paid to the future impact of the monstrous projects being planned.

Tip, Follow, Friend, Subscribe

Links & Information

Baristanet on Flickr